The Telematics Landscape in Commercial Trucking
Vendor market share, carrier segmentation, and safety outcomes across 259,000 FMCSA-registered carriers
Q1 2026 · Last updated February 2026
Key Findings
Samsara Leads, But the Market Is Fragmented
Samsara holds 19.6% of confirmed share, but with 25+ platforms identified, the top 5 vendors control only 57.5% of the market. Long-tail providers and in-house solutions account for a significant share of adoption.
Competitive Landscape Shifts by Fleet Size
Motive's share drops from 13.8% among small fleets to 5.5% among large fleets. Geotab moves in the opposite direction: 2.6% small to 8.2% large. Fleet size is the strongest predictor of vendor selection.
Carrier Specialty Is a Powerful Segmentation Signal
Beverage carriers are 4x more likely to use telematics than general freight carriers (index 427 vs 80). Commodity type predicts technology adoption better than geography.
Authority Profile Predicts Telematics Usage
Triple-authority carriers (common + contract + broker) index at 1,178 — 12x the baseline. Common-authority-only carriers index at just 62. Operating authority mix is a strong proxy for technology sophistication.
Confirmed Users Have Better Safety Records
Vehicle OOS rates are –30% lower, Driver OOS rates –60% lower for confirmed telematics users. The gap holds across all fleet sizes (p<0.001) and widens for large fleets.
Midwest Over-Indexes; CA and TX Under-Index
The Midwest leads with a 7.9% confirmed rate, while California (2.7%) and Texas (3.5%) trail — despite being the two largest carrier states. Regional adoption is shaped by fleet composition, not just fleet count.
Vendor Landscape
Overall Market Share
The telematics market in commercial trucking is led by Samsara, but concentration is moderate. The top three vendors — Samsara, Motive, and Omnitracs — account for just 39% of confirmed installations. A long tail of 15+ smaller platforms each hold 1–3% share, and a notable "Other" category (11.6%) captures carriers on platforms not individually tracked.
| # | Vendor | Share |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Samsara | 19.6% |
| 2 | Other | 11.6% |
| 3 | Motive | 10.0% |
| 4 | Omnitracs | 9.1% |
| 5 | PeopleNet | 8.8% |
| 6 | Geotab | 4.4% |
| 7 | Isaac | 3.9% |
| 8 | Verizon Connect | 3.4% |
| 9 | Trimble | 3.4% |
| 10 | Platform Science | 3.4% |
- Samsara
- Other
- Motive
- Omnitracs
- PeopleNet
- Geotab
- Isaac
- Verizon Connect
- Trimble
- Platform Science
Market Share by Fleet Size
Vendor preference shifts dramatically by fleet size. Motive dominates among small carriers (1–20 trucks) where price sensitivity and ease of self-installation matter most, but its share is cut in half among large fleets (100+ trucks). Geotab and Platform Science show the opposite pattern — both gain significant share as fleets get larger, suggesting their value proposition resonates with operations-heavy enterprises that need deep API integrations and fleet management platforms.
| Vendor | Small (1–20) | Mid (21–100) | Large (100+) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Samsara | 16.2% | 21.1% | 22.9% |
| Motive | 13.8% | 11.0% | 5.5% |
| Omnitracs | 6.8% | 9.8% | 12.9% |
| PeopleNet | 7.0% | 8.8% | 14.1% |
| Geotab | 2.6% | 3.2% | 8.2% |
| Isaac | 3.7% | 4.2% | 3.5% |
| Verizon Connect | 1.9% | 2.9% | 6.5% |
| Trimble | 2.4% | 3.2% | 5.1% |
| Platform Science | 2.1% | 2.7% | 6.4% |
Vendor Fleet Profiles
Geotab stands out with a median fleet size of 104 trucks — more than double the market median — and over half of its carrier base in the 100+ truck segment. By contrast, Motive's median fleet sits at 29 trucks and nearly a third of its users are small fleets. These profiles matter for sales and marketing: vendor selection correlates with organizational complexity, purchasing process, and technology maturity.
| Vendor | Carriers | Median Fleet | Small % | Mid % | Large % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samsara | 2,578 | 41 | 21.5% | 54.8% | 23.7% |
| Motive | 1,317 | 29 | 28.6% | 56.2% | 15.2% |
| Omnitracs | 1,196 | 46 | 19.4% | 55.1% | 25.5% |
| PeopleNet | 1,161 | 54 | 20.7% | 50.7% | 28.6% |
| Geotab | 582 | 104 | 12.2% | 36.6% | 51.2% |
| Isaac | 517 | 34 | 24.8% | 55.1% | 20.1% |
| Verizon Connect | 452 | 76 | 14.4% | 42.9% | 42.7% |
| Trimble | 446 | 60 | 18.4% | 47.5% | 34.1% |
| Platform Science | 445 | 75 | 16.4% | 40.7% | 42.9% |
Segmentation — Cargo Specialty
What a carrier hauls is one of the strongest predictors of whether it uses advanced telematics. Beverage carriers index at 427 — more than four times the average — driven by route density, strict delivery windows, and chain-of-custody requirements. Hazmat and refrigerated carriers also over-index significantly. At the other end, livestock and building materials carriers trail, reflecting industries where technology adoption has lagged.
| Cargo Specialty | Carriers | Confirmed | Index vs Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beverages | 1,842 | 401 | 427 |
| Hazmat | 8,573 | 1,410 | 323 |
| Refrigerated | 14,219 | 2,109 | 291 |
| Intermodal | 3,645 | 487 | 262 |
| Automobiles | 4,011 | 478 | 234 |
| Oilfield | 5,829 | 554 | 187 |
| Heavy Machinery | 7,214 | 601 | 164 |
| Flatbed / Metals | 11,360 | 782 | 135 |
| Dry Van / General | 153,298 | 6,250 | 80 |
| Household Goods | 9,746 | 342 | 69 |
| Logging | 3,120 | 97 | 61 |
| Building Materials | 6,871 | 198 | 57 |
| Livestock | 2,458 | 45 | 36 |
Segmentation — Authority Profile
A carrier's operating authority mix — the combination of common, contract, and broker authorities it holds — is a surprisingly powerful predictor of technology adoption. Triple-authority carriers (holding common, contract, and broker authority simultaneously) adopt telematics at 12x the average rate. These are typically sophisticated operations that offer multiple service types and have the organizational complexity that demands fleet management technology.
| Authority Profile | Carriers | Confirmed | Index |
|---|---|---|---|
| Common + Contract + Broker | 4,218 | 2,530 | 1,178 |
| Common + Contract | 11,492 | 3,987 | 681 |
| Common + Broker | 8,734 | 2,345 | 527 |
| Contract Only | 6,310 | 1,120 | 349 |
| Broker + Contract | 3,921 | 498 | 249 |
| Common Only | 198,450 | 2,488 | 62 |
| No Active Authority | 26,382 | 178 | 30 |
Regional Patterns
Telematics adoption varies significantly by region, and the patterns challenge simple assumptions about where technology is most prevalent. The Midwest leads nationally with a 7.9% confirmed rate — driven by large, established carriers in logistics-heavy states like Indiana, Ohio, and Illinois. Meanwhile, California and Texas — the two largest carrier states by volume — both under-index, at 2.7% and 3.5% respectively.
| Region | Total Carriers | Confirmed | Rate | Small Fleet Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Midwest | 52,341 | 4,135 | 7.9% | 4.1% |
| Southeast | 61,287 | 3,245 | 5.3% | 2.8% |
| Northeast | 38,912 | 1,946 | 5.0% | 2.5% |
| Mountain / Plains | 29,456 | 1,325 | 4.5% | 2.2% |
| Southwest (TX) | 42,189 | 1,477 | 3.5% | 1.6% |
| West (CA) | 35,322 | 1,018 | 2.7% | 1.2% |
Confirmed Telematics Rate by Region
The CA and TX underperformance is explained by fleet composition rather than technology aversion: both states have an outsized share of owner-operators and small fleets (1–5 trucks) that are below the threshold where telematics investment pays off. When controlling for fleet size, the gap between regions narrows — but doesn't disappear. Midwest carriers of every size adopt at higher rates, likely reflecting the region's concentration of asset-heavy, long-haul carriers with strong relationships with telematics sales channels.
Safety Profile
Carriers confirmed on a telematics platform have meaningfully better safety outcomes across every metric we measured. The most dramatic gap is in Driver Out-of-Service rates, where confirmed users are 60% lower — suggesting that telematics-equipped carriers invest more broadly in driver compliance and HOS management, not just vehicle tracking.
| Fleet Size | Vehicle OOS (Confirmed) | Vehicle OOS (Not Confirmed) | Driver OOS (Confirmed) | Driver OOS (Not Confirmed) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1–5 trucks | 18.2% | 24.1% | 3.1% | 6.8% |
| 6–20 trucks | 17.8% | 23.5% | 2.9% | 6.5% |
| 21–50 trucks | 16.4% | 22.8% | 2.6% | 6.1% |
| 51–100 trucks | 15.1% | 21.9% | 2.3% | 5.7% |
| 101–250 trucks | 13.8% | 20.6% | 2.0% | 5.2% |
| 250+ trucks | 11.5% | 19.2% | 1.6% | 4.8% |
Vehicle Out-of-Service Rate by Fleet Size
- Confirmed Telematics
- Not Confirmed
The safety advantage widens as fleet size increases. Among carriers with 250+ trucks, confirmed users show a Vehicle OOS rate of 11.5% vs 19.2% for non-confirmed carriers — a 40% reduction. This widening gap suggests that telematics delivers compounding value when integrated into large-scale operations with dedicated safety departments. The implications for insurance underwriting are significant: telematics status may be a proxy for operational discipline that predicts loss ratios better than traditional fleet size or safety score metrics alone.
Methodology
Data Sources & Approach
- Universe: 259,507 FMCSA-registered motor carriers, filtered to those with at least one roadside inspection in the trailing 12 months to ensure operational relevance.
- Confirmed status: A carrier is classified as a "confirmed telematics user" when AlphaLoops has identified it on a specific named platform beyond basic ELD compliance. This includes data from integration partnerships, public filings, device identifiers, and proprietary identification methods.
- Floor estimates: Confirmed rates (5.1% overall) represent a floor, not an estimate of true adoption. Many carriers use telematics platforms we have not yet identified. True advanced telematics penetration is higher.
- Relative comparisons are robust: While absolute rates are conservative, the relative comparisons across segments (e.g., beverages vs. general freight, Midwest vs. West) are valid and stable. Identification methodology does not vary by region, fleet size, or cargo type.
- Safety analysis: Out-of-Service (OOS) rates and violation counts are drawn from FMCSA inspection data. Statistical significance was assessed using two-proportion z-tests with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. All reported differences are significant at p<0.001.
- Fleet size: Determined from FMCSA Census data (power unit count). Categories: Small (1–20), Mid (21–100), Large (100+).
Frequently Asked Questions
Want this data for your GTM team?
AlphaLoops provides carrier intelligence to help freight brokers, insurers, and technology companies identify and qualify motor carriers.